Skip to content
  • Home
  • joost
    • contact
    • newsletter
  • films
  • installations
  • curating
  • live
  • courses
    • Frank with Frankenstein
      • description
      • texts
      • assignment
    • The Religion of Technology
      • description
      • texts
      • assignment
    • Theory and Actuality of Media Art
      • 1: visual music
      • 2: extended perception
      • 3: cyborgs
      • 4: robots
      • 5: bioart
      • 6: generative art
      • 7: virtual art
      • 8: communications art
      • 9: sound art
    • Sensory Augmentation Workshop
    • On Growth, Form and Evolution
    • Media Art Histories
    • Nine Snapshots
    • Machine Mediated Vision
      • course description
      • lecture 1: images from first principles
      • lecture 2: the camera eye
      • lecture 3: the dome of the sky
      • lecture 4: traces
      • assignment 2006/2007
      • assignment 2007/2008
      • assignment 2009/2010
      • assignment 2010/2011
      • assignment 2011/2012
    • Montage and Visual Composition in Time
    • Views on Technology
    • Essentials in Science and Technology
    • Writings about Technology
    • Mediated Architecture
    • The Language of ArtScience
    • Extra Senses, Extra Interference
    • workshop St. Lukas
    • Diagonal Montage
    • Mental Spaces
    • Autonomous Robots
    • Pattern and Visualization: Pattern Agents
    • Mental versus Virtual Space: Camillo’s Theatre of Memory
    • Pattern and Visualization: L-systems
  • writing
  • sources
    • objects
      • Applied Dynamics AD/FOUR hybrid computer (1966)
      • Solartron analog computer (ca. 1958)
    • texts
      • De Luce
      • Explanation of an Optical Deception
      • A New Art: Colour-Music
      • The Design of M. Speculatrix
      • Organics
  • research
light mattersJoost Rekveld
  • Home
  • joost
    • contact
    • newsletter
  • films
  • installations
  • curating
  • live
  • courses
    • Frank with Frankenstein
      • description
      • texts
      • assignment
    • The Religion of Technology
      • description
      • texts
      • assignment
    • Theory and Actuality of Media Art
      • 1: visual music
      • 2: extended perception
      • 3: cyborgs
      • 4: robots
      • 5: bioart
      • 6: generative art
      • 7: virtual art
      • 8: communications art
      • 9: sound art
    • Sensory Augmentation Workshop
    • On Growth, Form and Evolution
    • Media Art Histories
    • Nine Snapshots
    • Machine Mediated Vision
      • course description
      • lecture 1: images from first principles
      • lecture 2: the camera eye
      • lecture 3: the dome of the sky
      • lecture 4: traces
      • assignment 2006/2007
      • assignment 2007/2008
      • assignment 2009/2010
      • assignment 2010/2011
      • assignment 2011/2012
    • Montage and Visual Composition in Time
    • Views on Technology
    • Essentials in Science and Technology
    • Writings about Technology
    • Mediated Architecture
    • The Language of ArtScience
    • Extra Senses, Extra Interference
    • workshop St. Lukas
    • Diagonal Montage
    • Mental Spaces
    • Autonomous Robots
    • Pattern and Visualization: Pattern Agents
    • Mental versus Virtual Space: Camillo’s Theatre of Memory
    • Pattern and Visualization: L-systems
  • writing
  • sources
    • objects
      • Applied Dynamics AD/FOUR hybrid computer (1966)
      • Solartron analog computer (ca. 1958)
    • texts
      • De Luce
      • Explanation of an Optical Deception
      • A New Art: Colour-Music
      • The Design of M. Speculatrix
      • Organics
  • research
posted on 020071212

colloquy of mobiles

books . umwelt

colloquy3.jpg
two females and two males.

While leafing through the “Cybernetic Serendipity” catalogue busy looking for something else, I was struck by this description of the installation by Gordon Pask, called “The Colloquy of Mobiles”. Gordon Pask is amazing, and I didn’t realize he was in that 1968 exhibition. The installation consists of five ‘individuals’, two ‘male’ and three ‘female’, communicating through light and sound signals. They apparently learn about eachother through communication and their communications can be interfered with by the viewer. His own description of the piece doesn’t seem to be available on-line, so here it is, with some pictures from MedienKunstNetz:

“An ‘aesthetically potent’ environment is an environment of any sort (auditory, as in music, verbal, visual, tactile perhaps) that people are liable to enjoy and which serves to shape their enjoyment. An artist can certainly manufacture and mould such an environment (as he does by writing music, building a house or painting a picture), and, in so doing, he may communicate a message. But the quality of ‘aesthetic potency’, although it determines the framework in which artistic communication can take place, is primarily attached to a relation between the environment and the hearer or the viewer. An aesthetically potent environment encourages the hearer of viewer to explore it, to learn about it, to form a hierarchy of concepts that refer to it; further it guides his exploration; in a sense, it makes him participate in, or at any rate see himself reflected in, the environment.
Physically (though not psychologically) passive environments of this sort are familiar enough (music that bears repetition, paintings worth seeing twice). Active and even reactive environments have been fabricated with this property. The colloquy of mobiles is an attempt to go one step further in the same direction.
It is a group of objects, the individual mobiles, that engage in discourse, that compete, co-operate and learn about one another. Their discourse evolves at several levels in a hierarchy of control and a hierarchy of abstraction. The trick is that if you find them interesting then you can join in the discourse as well and bring your influence to bear by participating in what goes on. It is a crude demonstration of an idea that could be developed indefinitely.
Each individual mobile has a set of programmes that determine its motions and its visible state. Each individual learns how to deploy its programmes in order to achieve a goal; namely, to reduce an inbuilt drive. Its level of ‘satisfaction’ is reflected partly in its behaviour and partly in a visual display. The mobiles are of two sorts. As a whimsy, we have called one sort male, the other female.
Whereas males compete amongst themselves and so do females, a male may cooperate with a female and vice-versa, for one possesses programmes that are not in the repertoire of the other and jointly a male and female pair can achieve more than both individuals in isolation. Ironically, this property is manifest in the fact that a male can project strong beams of light but it cannot satisfy an urge to have them play on its periphery, whereas a female (who cannot shine light) is able to reflect it back to a male (and, when she is competent, to reflect it upon the right position). To co-operate or even to orient themselves and to engage their programmes, the mobiles must communicate. They do so in a simple but many-levelled language of light flashes and sounds. You may engage in this discourse if you wish to, though your goals may be alien to the goals of the mobiles; for example, you might be trying to achieve a configuration that you regard as pleasing.”

colloquy2.jpg
top view and front diagram of installation.

colloquy1.jpg
another exhibition view, note ‘Cysp I‘ by Nicolas Schöffer on the right.

I do have a newsletter.

friends

  • Arthur Elsenaar
  • Bart Vegter
  • bmb con
  • center for visual music
  • Cocky Eek
  • Ellen Røed
  • filmstad
  • foam
  • iiinitiative
  • Isabelle Vigier
  • Jeff Guess
  • kask
  • lightcone
  • mediakunst
  • Nicolas Schöffer
  • optofonica
  • Paul Prudence
  • s:pam
  • sonic acts
  • synergetica
  • telcosystems
  • veenfabriek
  • Yannis Kyriakides

stuff I look at

  • analog computer museum
  • arch
  • arqueologia del futuro
  • chemoton
  • compasswallah
  • dataisnature
  • elsewhere
  • integer sequences
  • lifewiki
  • nota arsivleri
  • nullschool earth
  • picture of the day
  • prime numbers
  • radical constructivism
  • study of perceptual experience
  • tekwiki
  • the virtual laboratory
  • you broke the internet

Archives

  • September 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • February 2016
  • November 2015
  • May 2015
  • February 2015
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • March 2013
  • June 2012
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • January 2006